Nano X2 is comfier for mixed workouts; Metcon 8 is sturdier for heavy lifts.
I see the same struggle every week: one shoe for squats, sleds, and short runs. The Reebok Nano X2 vs Nike Metcon 8 are my go-tos. Both shine, but in different ways. I’ve trained in each across WODs, strength days, and circuits. I’ll share what stood out so you can choose the best fit for your training style.
TOP PICK
Reebok Men’s Nano X2 Training…
SOFT AND DURABLE UPPER: Flexweave knit is comfortable and breathable without sacrificing the toughness your training requires. TRAIN ANYWHERE: A durable rubber outsole provides reliable…
TrainingShoe-
Check Amazon Price
RECOMMENDED
Nike Metcon 9 Men’s Workout…
We’ve further expanded the HyperLift plate in the heel for added stability during more demanding workouts, like split squats, bodyweight training and lower body exercises….
Men’sWorkout
Check Amazon Price
Is Reebok Nano X2 Good?
Yes—for most people. The Nano X2 is a strong all-rounder. It blends stable lifting with better comfort for conditioning. I recommend it if you do a bit of everything: squats, kettlebells, box jumps, and 1–2 mile runs. It has a wider feel, smooth cushioning, and a secure heel. It is not the stiffest shoe, but it handles real-world training very well.
I first noticed it during a chipper with wall balls, step-overs, and double-unders. My feet felt fresh after. On another day, I paired front squats with a 1k row and burpees. The Nano X2 kept me planted under the bar. Then it stayed comfy for the metcon. That balance is why I keep it in my bag.
What Makes It Stand Out / Key Features
- Flexweave upper for breathable, reinforced support
- Firm base with a secure heel clip for stability under load
- Floatride-style forefoot cushioning for jumps and runs
- Rope-ready midfoot wrap and grippy outsole
- Roomier toe box for natural toe splay
What I Like
- Great blend of comfort and stability for mixed training
- Better for short runs than many “lifting-first” trainers
- Wide, steady platform for squats and deadlifts
- Upper breathes well in hot, high-rep sessions
- Easy daily-wear feel without being sloppy under load
What Could Be Better
- Not as rock-solid as Metcon 8 for very heavy lifts
- Forefoot cushion can feel a bit bouncy for max attempts
- Traction can squeak on some glossy floors
My Recommendation
Pick the Nano X2 if you want one shoe for most gym days. It balances lifting, conditioning, and comfort with ease.
| Best For | Why |
|---|
| Cross-training classes | Stable heel plus forgiving forefoot |
| Short runs in WODs | Smoother cushion than stiff lifters |
| Wide feet or toe splay | Roomier toe box |
Is Nike Metcon 8 Good?
Yes—if lifting stability is your priority. The Metcon 8 is firm, flat, and locked-in. It suits heavy squats, pulls, and Olympic lifting practice. It also eats rope climbs and wall work. If you live on the strength side of training and only run short bursts, it shines.
I wore the Metcon 8 for a heavy clean complex and EMOMs with rope climbs. The heel felt like concrete in a good way. No mush. Later, I did handstand push-ups against the wall. The heel clip helped reduce drag. On sprint intervals, it felt fine. On longer runs, not so much. But for barbell confidence, it’s hard to beat.
What Makes It Stand Out / Key Features
- Low, rigid heel and wide base for rock-solid lifts
- React drop-in midsole balances firmness with some snap
- Durable rope wrap and grippy outsole
- Heel clip that slides on wall work
- Supportive upper with targeted overlays
What I Like
- Exceptional stability for heavy squats and pulls
- Great rope traction and durability
- Secure midfoot lock for fast lateral moves
- Outsole grips rubber floors and turf well
- Confidence under the bar, even when fatigued
What Could Be Better
- Not ideal for runs beyond a mile
- Stiffer feel; takes a few sessions to break in
- Narrower midfoot can feel snug for wide feet
My Recommendation
Choose the Metcon 8 if strength and stability come first, and your runs are short.
| Best For | Why |
|---|
| Heavy lifting | Low, rigid heel and firm platform |
| Rope climbs | Aggressive rope wrap durability |
| Handstand push-ups | Heel clip reduces wall drag |
Reebok Nano X2 vs Nike Metcon 8: Side-by-Side Test
I ran both shoes through barbell work, metcons, sprints, and skill sessions. Here’s how the Reebok Nano X2 vs Nike Metcon 8 stacked up in real training.
Lifting Stability: Which Feels Stronger Under the Bar?
Both are stable, but their feel differs. Here is what I found in heavy sets.
| Aspect | Reebok Nano X2 | Nike Metcon 8 |
|---|
| Heel firmness | Firm with slight give | Very firm, almost rigid |
| Base width | Wide and supportive | Wide and ultra-planted |
| Olympic lifts | Good for practice, forgiving | Excellent for stability |
| Max attempts | Good up to moderate-heavy | Best for near-max work |
Rating: Reebok Nano X2 – 8.5/10 | Nike Metcon 8 – 9.5/10
Edge: Metcon 8 for its rock-solid heel and locked-in platform.
Short Runs & Conditioning: Which Is Kinder to Your Feet?
When the clock hits a mix of sprints, burpees, and box jumps, comfort matters.
| Aspect | Reebok Nano X2 | Nike Metcon 8 |
|---|
| 1–2 mile run | Smooth and less jarring | Firm, serviceable but harsh |
| Plyometrics | Snappy forefoot cushion | Stable but stiff on landings |
| Intervals | Comfortable stride | Better for sprints than long |
| All-day feel | More comfortable | Performance-first fit |
Rating: Reebok Nano X2 – 9/10 | Nike Metcon 8 – 7.5/10
Edge: Nano X2 for comfort and mixed-modal sessions.
Fit & Comfort: Which Fits More Feet?
Fit can make or break a shoe. Here is how each felt on me.
| Aspect | Reebok Nano X2 | Nike Metcon 8 |
|---|
| Toe box | Roomier, natural splay | More snug, precise |
| Midfoot hold | Secure but not tight | Very locked in |
| Break-in time | Short | Moderate |
| Daily comfort | High | Medium |
Rating: Reebok Nano X2 – 9/10 | Nike Metcon 8 – 8/10
Edge: Nano X2 for wider feet and comfort; Metcon 8 for a snug, performance lock.
Durability & Rope Climbs: Which Lasts Longer Under Abuse?
I tested rope climbs and high-friction moves.
| Aspect | Reebok Nano X2 | Nike Metcon 8 |
|---|
| Rope grip | Good midfoot wrap | Excellent rope wrap |
| Upper abrasion | Strong woven upper | Reinforced overlays |
| Heel scuff on wall | Standard heel | Heel clip reduces drag |
| Long-term wear | Very good | Excellent for rope-heavy days |
Rating: Reebok Nano X2 – 8.5/10 | Nike Metcon 8 – 9/10
Edge: Metcon 8 for rope work and wall contact durability.
Traction & Grip: Which Bites the Floor Better?
Grip keeps you honest on fast turns and heavy pulls.
| Surface | Reebok Nano X2 | Nike Metcon 8 |
|---|
| Rubber gym floor | Strong grip | Strong grip |
| Turf | Stable, controlled | Very secure |
| Wood/platform | Confident stance | Locked-in stance |
| Court turns | Good with some squeak | Very planted |
Rating: Reebok Nano X2 – 8.5/10 | Nike Metcon 8 – 9/10
Edge: Metcon 8 for slightly better bite and planting on hard turns.
Breathability & Upper Feel: Which Stays Cooler?
Hot days and long metcons reveal upper performance fast.
| Aspect | Reebok Nano X2 | Nike Metcon 8 |
|---|
| Airflow | Very breathable | Good breathability |
| Heat buildup | Low | Moderate |
| Flex points | Flexible forefoot | Stiffer forefoot |
| Comfort in WODs | All-day friendly | Performance-focused |
Rating: Reebok Nano X2 – 9/10 | Nike Metcon 8 – 8/10
Edge: Nano X2 for better airflow and flex during long sessions.
Versatility: Which Covers More Bases?
If you want one shoe for many moves, range matters.
| Use Case | Reebok Nano X2 | Nike Metcon 8 |
|---|
| Strength + metcon mix | Excellent balance | Very good |
| Longer cardio | Better option | Not ideal |
| Max lifting | Very good | Excellent |
| Everyday wear | Comfortable | More performance feel |
Rating: Reebok Nano X2 – 9/10 | Nike Metcon 8 – 8/10
Edge: Nano X2 for one-shoe versatility; Metcon 8 for strength-first days.
Value for Money: Which Feels Worth It?
Both are premium. Value depends on your training split.
| Aspect | Reebok Nano X2 | Nike Metcon 8 |
|---|
| What you get | Comfort + stability | Top-tier stability |
| Durability per use | High across varied work | High for lifting/ropes |
| Cost justification | Great for generalists | Great for lifters |
| Replacement cycle | Long for mixed use | Long for strength focus |
Rating: Reebok Nano X2 – 9/10 | Nike Metcon 8 – 9/10
Edge: Tie—pick based on whether you lift-first (Metcon 8) or train-all (Nano X2).
Final Verdict: Which Should You Buy?
If your workouts mix strength, circuits, jumps, and short runs, go Reebok Nano X2. It is the more comfortable daily driver in the Reebok Nano X2 vs Nike Metcon 8 debate, and it fits wider feet well.
If your week leans heavy—barbell lifts, rope climbs, and wall work—pick Nike Metcon 8. It is firmer, more planted, and inspires confidence when the weight gets serious.
FAQs Of Reebok Nano X2 vs Nike Metcon 8
Which is better for heavy lifting?
Metcon 8. It has a firmer heel and a very stable base.
Which is better for short runs and conditioning?
Nano X2. It has smoother forefoot cushioning and better all-day comfort.
Which fits wider feet better?
Nano X2. The toe box feels roomier. Metcon 8 has a snugger midfoot.
How do they compare for rope climbs?
Metcon 8 has the edge with an aggressive rope wrap. Nano X2 still holds up well.
If I can buy only one, which should I choose?
If your training is mixed, get Nano X2. If you live for the barbell, get Metcon 8. The Reebok Nano X2 vs Nike Metcon 8 choice comes down to your weekly split.
Rubel Miah is the Senior Editor at MyStyleGrid.com, where he brings a sharp editorial eye and an unshakable love for fashion to everything he does. A true style addict, Rubel lives and breathes trends, from streetwear to high fashion, and has a knack for turning inspiration into impactful stories. With years of experience in fashion journalism and digital media, he curates content that empowers readers to express themselves through style. When he’s not editing features or forecasting the next big thing, you’ll find him hunting down vintage pieces or capturing street style moments around the city.
